I have taken an interest in the future of the Church Institute and adjacent Churchmen’s Club at Llanfairfechan, which are extraordinarily well-preserved examples of arts-and-crafts architecture, so redolent of community ethos between the wars. The buildings are in need of an imaginative solution which protects their character – tricky because they are both small scale. Ideally, they should be in the care of a trust.

This is the Church Institute (more drizzle):-

And this is the interior of the adjacent Churchmen’s Club where ex-soldiers could play billiards after the First World War:-

We walked out to the lighthouse on Llanddwyn Island: bad weather, but still atmospheric in the drizzle:-

There was sea holly by the beach:-

Then we saw the lighthouse in the distance:-

The cottages:-

Back to the forest:-

Now that Michael Gove has shown the courage of his convictions in turning down permission for Marks and Spencer to demolish its flagship store in Oxford Street, let’s hope he does the same for a much more monstrous carbuncle planned for the south side of the River Thames in one of the most prominent sites in London – a vast megalith which not least will dwarf the House of Commons and make St. Paul’s look insignificant. One of the problems with these planning enquiries is that they drag on and on, so that everyone forgets what is at stake.

Just in case you’ve forgotten I am posting an image of what is proposed:-

It’s such good news that Michael Gove has refused permission for Marks and Spencer to redevelop its flagship store on Oxford Street. It’s not an especially distinguished building, but infinitely preferable to the measly nondescript building which was planned to replace it, having at least some sense of civic dignity which the replacement totally lacks. But more important than the character of the architecture was whether or not it is sensible in the current environment gratuitously to demolish an existing building, rather than seek to refurbish it. In the course of the debate surrounding Marks and Spencer, the mood in the architectural profession has rightly shifted to refurbishment where possible. Marks and Spencer could, and should, have been a leader in this movement, but instead adopted nihilistic corporate values, as reflected in the vituperative comments of its Chief Executive. Gove should be congratulated.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jul/20/marks-spencer-refused-permission-to-demolish-and-rebuild-oxford-street-store

I’m pleased to see that the Museum of the Home has been given a Reinvention Award by the RIBA: pleased not least that the RIBA now has a Reinvention Award, which recognises high-quality buildings which involve a considerable amount of adaptation and re-use as the Museum of the Home does, preserving the existing early eighteenth-century almshouse building, creating a new run of galleries in the basement and opening a new garden, all of it done with skill.

One wonders where this leaves the Marks and Spencer building in Oxford Street where Marks and Spencer plan to demolish their existing flagship store to replace it with a notably bland office block, as if this will help to regenerate Oxford Street. Michael Gove is due to make an announcement any minute.

https://www.ft.com/content/881d861b-0760-4a1c-a014-8e2023b61e58

We went to the unveiling of Swarm, a new, surprisingly delicate and refined piece of public sculpture by Alison Wilding on the side of what used to be the Canadian Embassy, Macdonald House, built by the Grosvenor Estate in the late 1930s and originally occupied by the American Embassy. The building was sold to the Lhoda Group in 2013 who commissioned Eric Parry to reconstruct it, which involved taking the building down, laying it out in the Isle of Dogs and then building it anew. The commission was overseen by Modus Operandi:-

Last September, I went to a long-delayed memorial event for the late David Lowenthal, a historian and geographer I greatly admired who died in September 2018 in his late nineties (he was born on 26 April 1923). As a result, I was asked to contribute a short essay to a volume of essays by friends and colleagues which had already been published as a special volume of Landscape Research. Rather amazingly, this volume is already available with a new introduction and my essay in spite of the fact that I feel that have only just delivered my contribution.

You can get it with a hefty discount from Pages of Hackney, our nearly local bookshop (David Lowenthal’s Archipelagic and Transatlantic Landscapes: His Public and Scholarly Heritage – Pages of Hackney).

I strongly recommend Anselm Kiefer’s Finnegans Wake exhibition at White Cube in Bermondsey: so dense, so intense, using the different spaces inventively, hard to imagine how it was installed:-

I spent a sadly damp half day at Farnham, Surrey visiting 1, Middle Avenue, an admirable new build house, using elements of an arts-and-craft vernacular, but in a modern way, which has been long listed for the Stirling Prize and, if the prize has an interest in private housing, should be on the short list as well.

I then wandered round the town, or what’s left of it, in the drizzle. They have kept the fine Georgian streetscapes, but everything else seemed to be a sea of motorcars, including all parked in the historic Castle Street – a pity for a town which is described as architecturally exceptional and probably once was before being blighted by 4x4s:-