Castle Howard (2)

I spent the day with a group convened by the Paul Mellon Centre, Tate Britain and York University to ponder the history of the room arrangements at Castle Howard which are very complex, each generation changing the hang, adding more objects, moving the pictures round, and not necessarily keeping a record of what was done.   

We started in the Great Hall, which occupies much of the central volume of the house, an extraordinarily and unnecessarily stately entrance to the house with two flanking staircases essentially invisible behind.   Below Phaeton in the dome (repainted after the fire) are Pellegrini’s four elements.   Earth:-

And Air:-

Huge columns:-

And the overmantel is by the great Italian stuccadore, Giovanni Bagutti:-

Then down the formal enfilade of the south front:-

Past the fifth Earl who is now the property of Tate:-

Not sitting on the tapestry chairs which are maybe all that remains of the third Earl’s furnishings:-

To the Long Gallery in Thomas Robinson’s wing, as depicted by John Jackson:-

The questions we were being asked were: to what extent should one treat a country house as an aggregate, a set of complex accretions, each generation adding a new layer ?  Or should it be treated like a museum with each layer being carefully documented and revealed ?  I agreed with those who argued that a country house is not a museum and that its owners have a different set of responsibilities and freedoms to do what they want in terms not of museum-style installation, but more theatrical and aesthetic forms of interior decoration.

 

Standard

5 thoughts on “Castle Howard (2)

  1. Christopher Nevile says:

    Sadly the dead drab hand of control has begun to render this fascinating debate almost irrelevant. Such is the timidity of the National Trust and the power of “The Listing Authorities” that it is only the toughest negotiators (and outlaws) who can really impose their own aesthetic on the Country House of today. Of course dilapidation and fires do sometimes give the opportunity for spectacular rebirth. I do hope Clandon will be a case in point.

  2. Of course you and Christopher Nevile are quite right. The Country House has GOT to have individuality and a personal aesthetic. Although having a Life like that should not preclude a respect for, and scholarly appreciation of, the paintings and works of art.

    Your photographs are indeed redolent of Brideshead.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s