Typography and the Museum (2)

A couple of footnotes to the discussion on typography and museums.

  1. We were asked which museums do their graphic design best.   Both Harry Pearce and I instinctively answered MoMA.   I didn’t know, which I no doubt should have done, that the classic MoMA logotype was designed by Ivan Chermayeff in Franklin Gothic No 2 and launched in 1964, remaining fairly unchanged ever since, proof of its effectiveness.   ‘The ideas that are quick, even instantaneous, are the best’, he said. ‘I sometimes have a great idea while the problem is still being described by the client.   I have learned that the worst thing you can do is to put that idea forward immediately, because then it has no value’.
  2. I couldn’t remember who had designed the National Gallery’s logotype, which was in the process of being designed when I arrived in July 2002 and has survived pretty intact ever since.   The answer, I think, is that it was done by Lee Hoddy, the then creative director of Bamber Forsyth.   The font used – and which they still use – is (very appropriately) Bembo: conservative, but clear, legible and smart. We also put the definite article back, but asymetrically:-
National-Gallery-London-Logo-24 - Fortecho Solutions
Standard

2 thoughts on “Typography and the Museum (2)

  1. Pam Roberts says:

    I love typography. Probably initially enthused by the Guardian’s April Fool’s Day Sans Serrife supplement many decades ago. Never been surpassedn in my opinion.

  2. Pam Roberts says:

    I love typography. Probably initially enthused by the Guardian’s April Fool’s Day Sans Serrife supplement many decades ago. Never been surpassed in my opinion.

Leave a Reply to Pam Roberts Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s