I had hoped to go to more of the conference about John Golding at the Courtauld Institute than just seeing the film, A Path to the Absolute, that Bruno Wollheim has made, but not finished, about him. I knew John Golding only slightly, admiring him and his writings from afar, meeting him only occasionally with Bruno where dinner would be dominated by Richard Wollheim, leaving John as a drily amusing and slightly saturnine memory. Through the film I learned more: his upbringing in Mexico; returning to London in 1951 to go to the Courtauld Institute; nothing about being taught by Anthony Blunt, an odd gap as Blunt must have supervised Golding’s PhD. on Cubism; his friendship with Douglas Cooper; his hands shaking before lecturing; then turning to pure painting and teaching at the RCA. There was much about Golding being known primarily as an art historian and his relative neglect as a painter. But he was great as an art historian, bringing qualities of intellectual precision to the study of twentieth-century art, and important for his influence on a generation of students including T.J. Clark, whereas no-one is suggesting he had quite the same importance as an artist.
Maybe not, but he was no slouch as a painter.
Saw you there! Fascinating lecture by John Elderfield after you left.
I’m going back for more tomorrow.
I know all about the painter/writer dichotomy as Maurice was in that position.
Yes, I wish I could have stayed. Hope it goes well tomorrow. Charles