A week ago, I thought it just possible that the information which was leaking out about Jennifer Arcuri was more likely to bring Boris Johnson down than the Supreme Court announcement that he had lied to the Queen about his reasons for proroguing parliament. It seems that the tory press don’t object to legal and constitutional impropriety, particularly since they think, without evidence, that it is politically motivated, but they do like sleaze because it sells papers. So, I am not sure that the story of Johnson sneaking off in the afternoon to the apartment of a 24-year old volunteer to have what he describes as technical discussions is going to go away; particularly as she was very handsomely compensated with massive sums of public money for her new start-up business, which turns out not to have been in IT, as was originally suggested, but now appears to have involved the arrangement of events for members of the American alt right. Even Johnson, who has a well developed knack for brushing off impropriety, is surely going to find it hard to demonstrate that he followed due process in paying a pole dancer £100,000 of public funds.
😇😋📣
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 1:28 PM | Charles | Saumarez | Smith | wrote:
> Charles Saumarez Smith posted: ” A week ago, I thought it just possible > that the information which was leaking out about Jennifer Arcuri was more > likely to bring Boris Johnson down than the Supreme Court announcement that > he had lied to the Queen about his reasons for proroguing parliam” >
We can but hope that the accumulation of evidence of Johnson’s various thigh-squeezing, pole-dancing sponsorship etc. might eventually lead to some more serious questioning now that government money is involved?
Yes, now that there is an investigation, it seems a bit implausible that he is entirely innocent. Charles
There’s something rather pathetic about a man who finds it impossible to stop groping women. It ought to rule him out, but I fear that it will not.