Romilly Saumarez Smith (3)

I have been asked what is the relationship between Edmund de Waal’s work and Romilly’s.   The answer is in the way that the forms of the past influence and inform the material present, so that both have a preoccupation with the archaeology of forms.   Romilly specifically requested that some of Edmund’s work should be displayed not behind glass, so should share in the aesthetic of the found object:

image

image

image

Here are more views of Romilly’s work:

image

image

image

Standard

One thought on “Romilly Saumarez Smith (3)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s